Former Official
Criticism of Federal Investigative Leadership
In a recent interview, a former senior government official sharply criticized federal investigative leaders for mishandling major cases before the 2016 election. He said a top agency leader “acted unilaterally in decisions” and “bypassed established legal procedures,” arguing such decisions should have involved the Department of Justice, not just the agency director.
Allegations of Uneven Treatment
The official claimed the agency used “different standards when investigating separate high-profile matters.” He noted that one case was quietly dropped while another involving a different political figure was aggressively pursued, suggesting “selective transparency.” These actions, he said, influenced public perception during a tense political period.
Impact on Public Debate and Trust
This interview has reignited discussions about the integrity of law enforcement agencies in politically sensitive cases. It highlights ongoing concerns about whether investigations are conducted fairly and without bias, especially in the lead-up to elections.
